Addendum 81 supplements the Addendum 76 adoption of standard ANSI/RESNET/ICC 301-2022 as the basis for the RESNET HERS®. It adopts Standard 301-2022 Addenda C and E and incorporates clarifications of certain energy rating software simulation data sources and criteria. Addendum C establishes software simulation requirements that improve the consistency of different rating software tools. Addendum E clarifies the simulation requirements for Central Fan Integrated Supply (CFIS) systems. The public comment period will begin February 12, 2025, and end March 13, 2025. Comments will only be accepted on changes indicated by strike through and underlined text in red print in the file. To review the draft click on Draft PDS-01, MINHERS Addendum 81, Adoption of ANSI/RESNET/ICC 301-2022 Supplement To submit your comments, click on “SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE” below. To review the draft addendum and view comments submitted, click on “VIEW THE DRAFT AND COMMENTS HERE” below. Comments are posted online and you will be able to review comments by clicking on “VIEW COMMENTS HERE” below. When submitting a comment, you must close the page out and re-open it to view your comment. Refreshing the page will cause the comment to be submitted a second time. When posting a comment, please refrain from using your device’s autofill feature as this may prevent your comment from being submitted. SUBMIT COMMENTS HERE Submit your comment below for Draft PDS-01, MINHERS Addendum 81, Adoption of ANSI/RESNET/ICC 301-2022 Supplement COMMENTER First Name: * Last Name: * Affiliation * (who you represent) LOCATION Country : * United States of AmericaCanada Address: * City: * State/Province: * AlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming Zip Code: * CONTACT INFORMATION Phone Number: * Email Address: * COMMENT Page Number: * Section/Table/Figure Number: Comment Intent: * Select a Comment IntentObjectionNot an Objection Comment Type: * Select a Comment TypeGeneralTechnicalEditorial Click the "DOWNLOAD FORM" link below to complete your comment and proposed change, then upload the completed form below. Use "strikethrough" and "underline" formatting to indicate all proposed changes. Changes must be shown with "hard-formatting" strikethrough and underline, not "track changes." DOWNLOAD FORM Upload Comment and Proposed Change Form * Drop a file here or click to upload Choose File Maximum file size: 268.44MB Submit Start Over If you are human, leave this field blank. VIEW COMMENTS HERE Full Name: Scott HorowitzAffiliation: NRELAddress: 15013 Denver West Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401Phone Number: 303-883-2792Email: scott.horowitz@nrel.govPage Number: 4-6Section/Table/Figure Number: Sections 4.2.2.7.1.4, 4.2.2.7.2.8, 4.2.2.7.2.9, 4.2.2.7.2.10Comment Intent: ObjectionComment Type: TechnicalComment and Proposed Change: Download Tips and Reminders for Submitting Public Comments Comments must pertain to the changes shown in the draft as either strike-through or underlined text in red print. Comments not on the changes under consideration will be rejected. Comments should include a specific proposed change to the text of the draft open for comment and an explanation sufficient for the review committees to understand the commenter’s concern or objection. Proposed added text must be underlined and text proposed to be removed must be shown using strike-through. If not submitted in this format, the public comment may be rejected. Do not submit comments on other chapters or on sections or proposed changes that are not identified as open for public comment by red print. Comments not on the proposal under consideration will be rejected. If you submit public comment representing the collective interests of a group of stakeholders, you are encouraged to submit ONE public comment and identify all stakeholders in that comment. While not required, this expedites the ability of the committees to respond to commenters in a timely manner. Public comments are reviewed by committees comprised of volunteer members, that are Raters, Providers, Software Developers and other industry and public interest stakeholders. They are not reviewed by RESNET Staff. Most amendments to RESNET standards are proposed by industry and public stakeholders not RESNET. To learn more about submitting proposed amendments visit this page: https://www.resnet.us/about/standards/submit-proposed-amendments/